> Some comments on String classes. I think that a radically
> different direction could be beneficial. I know from my
> experience with the MOString class that its hard to
> satisfy everyone with one object. I just get all the weird
> methods in there that people want, and people start
> commenting on how large and inefficient is seems to be
> getting.
Just in case there are MiscKit-ers that aren't hooked up to the OPN mailing list or haven't read comp.sys.next.announce lately (slim chance, eh?), the posting below came across recently, and it seems relevant to the "Strings..." thread.
Best regards,
-- DanG
-- Daniel L. Green | Electronic Frontier Foundation | NextMail
-- Pencom Software | Member #297 | gladly
-- dang@pencom.com | for more info: eff@eff.org | accepted!